By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
I have been overwhelmed by the number of requests for new passwords
It is going to take a while as each one has to be dealt with and replied to individually but I am working on them and will get back to you as soon as I am able.
Brian.
Thank you for your patience, I am getting there.
-
10th May 2012, 08:57 AM
#21
Blue Ensign?
Brian/John,
Ref your posts above. I seem to remember there was one or two Masters in the China that used to fly this flag and then it was the sole preserve of the Master.
To extend things a little. Do you both not think that the demeaning of the Red Ensign to FOC status makes somewhat of a mockery to these men who are now flying the Blue Ensign.
I am sure these Masters have all the best will in the world and we are thankful for their efforts when we need them. But just stop and think of what the Blue Ensign is in the wake of.
Brgds
Bill
-
10th May 2012, 10:11 AM
#22
Flags
Bill, I think the red ensign is a flag for history. It should never be forgotten, but personally when working in latter years it didnt really matter to me what flag you sailed under, usually there was no flag there in any case as no one seemed to bother putting one up, unless you went to a port where they wanted to be officious about it. One time lying at the Eastern anchorage in Singapore there was a japanese (cadet ship I assume ) close by, it was a privilege to see the way the flags went up every morning and came down at night, bells rung in the morning at 0800 hours. Brought back memories. Every ship in the anchorage if they had a flag up just left it up all night. As you say in one of your posts, the japanese are still strong on tradition. The Americans still stick I think to a few of the old ways insisting that a US citizen is master and Ch. engineer, when this disappeared from British ships I dont know. I had to get special permission to sail under their flag, which I thought was the correct thing to do in anycase. However times change not always for the better. What annoys me is the idiots in The Euro. insisting that the Euro flag fly over Westminster, which is a meaningless flag for an idiotic bunch of worthless Eurocrats, if they wanted to sue me for saying such, they wouldnt get much as have nothing worth suing for. Anyhow we are supposed to be a Democratic people and can say what we believe in. Cheers John Sabourn.
-
10th May 2012, 11:32 AM
#23
I believe the Japanese had a sail training ship and a general cargo (conventional) training ship. The NYK cadets were referred to midshipmen (touch of the BF or some would say BS here). The Japanese were very Naval like and it was difficult to ever penetrate that bamboo screen. Socialising was restricted to a beer following the evening meal. Ten minutes max and that was it . No bars, no drinking in each others cabins. Walking around the ship was akin , I suspect, to walking around a monastery. However, I have said it before that in my opinion they were the finest natural seamen I ever had the good fortune to sail with. Problems were addressed in a very cool manner and I was invariably told about them by the Chief or Mate after the problems was sorted and always in a 'matter of fact' sort of way. I miss those days.
Bill
-
11th May 2012, 06:43 AM
#24

Originally Posted by
Capt Bill Davies
Brian/John,
Ref your posts above. I seem to remember there was one or two Masters in the China that used to fly this flag and then it was the sole preserve of the Master.
To extend things a little. Do you both not think that the demeaning of the Red Ensign to FOC status makes somewhat of a mockery to these men who are now flying the Blue Ensign.
I am sure these Masters have all the best will in the world and we are thankful for their efforts when we need them. But just stop and think of what the Blue Ensign is in the wake of.
Brgds
Bill
A valid point Bill, but is this sometimes a case of vanity on behalf of the skipper, or is it that they have not considered the total concept of it all?
In your opinion, what do you consider to be the requiremenst in todays conditions for the Red Ensign still to be flown on a ship? Is it still the right of a British born captain to have the choice to fly it, or is there some other reason?


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
11th May 2012, 07:32 AM
#25
Two points here John.
I would say there is an element of vanity in any individual flying the Blue Ensign but then I have a dislike for anything ostentatious so I am not giving a totally unbiased view. I stopped wearing a uniform in 1967!
The requirements to own a British ship and fly the Red Ensign which prevailed in the 50s/60s are no longer with us. The requirements now allows any person or ‘body corporate’ to own a British ship. Any half decent Lawyer can sort the BOS element. You will recall when this Tonnage Tax took hold a former CEO of the MCA landed a good job with a Korean Shipping Company. There was a Storey there somewhere.
Again, the British born (white on other posts) Master was never a requirement. As long as he was domiciled in the UK all was well. The critical thing in the system of old as you remember it is the Beneficial Ownership (BOS). It had to be BRITISH. Now the owner and crew may never have seen the skies over UK. As long as the have the British Cadet all is well.......except for the cadet of course. The Cadet will have left one of our colleges lectured by someone who is not always a nautical person as you and I would see it and then gains his seagoing experience as the 'only round eye on board'. Why am I thinking of the 'blind leading the blind'
Brgds
Bill
-
11th May 2012, 09:31 AM
#26
Uniforms MN
I am probably wrong in this so maybe shot down in flames. Most MN uniforms as such were not legally uniforms as such, but classed as company livery. I dont know the legal aspects of such but the MN cap badge bears the Crown. Most Company livery did not. Braid the regulation MN was gold bands with a diamond, most companys braid was different. I was told years ago that the diamond represented certificated rank, however you get skippers on pleasure boats sporting this. Maybe someone can clarify all this, not that it is considered important but just for curiosity. Regards John Sabourn
-
11th May 2012, 10:54 AM
#27
In ESSO we were issued with Grey trousers and grey shirts, looked like fugitives from Alcatraz, with the relevent epaulets.
also white boiler suits and safety boots, helmets, goggles, gloves and heavy coats if in the North Sea Trade.
Cheers
Brian.
-
11th May 2012, 12:42 PM
#28

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
I am probably wrong in this so maybe shot down in flames. Most MN uniforms as such were not legally uniforms as such, but classed as company livery. I dont know the legal aspects of such but the MN cap badge bears the Crown. Most Company livery did not. Braid the regulation MN was gold bands with a diamond, most companys braid was different. I was told years ago that the diamond represented certificated rank, however you get skippers on pleasure boats sporting this. Maybe someone can clarify all this, not that it is considered important but just for curiosity. Regards John Sabourn
When I was in British general cargo tramps and Ore Carriers we invariably carried Un-certificated Third Mate who braid was such that the upper part of the diamond was removed which seems to give support to premise.
I use to prefer the loop rather than the diamond but that was probably me wanting to be different. On many of the ships the jacket only was the only acknowledgement with most wearing grey flannel trousers.
When I joined NBC I asked Brenda Silver about the attire expected and she advised Khaki shirt and matching trousers and 'Do not wear insignia of any description as if Mr Ludwig hears of it you will be off in a flash' .
Brgds
Bill
-
11th May 2012, 04:26 PM
#29
Red Duster

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
I am probably wrong in this so maybe shot down in flames. Most MN uniforms as such were not legally uniforms as such, but classed as company livery. I dont know the legal aspects of such but the MN cap badge bears the Crown. Most Company livery did not. Braid the regulation MN was gold bands with a diamond, most companys braid was different. I was told years ago that the diamond represented certificated rank, however you get skippers on pleasure boats sporting this. Maybe someone can clarify all this, not that it is considered important but just for curiosity. Regards John Sabourn
During WWII you could be jailed for wearing a MN Officers uniform, if you were not in the MN (or presumably also not an officer). What todays situation is I don't know
-
11th May 2012, 09:55 PM
#30
The diamond back in the far off past signified a certifciate , Clan line and BP to the best of my knowlkedge were the only ones to have a Royal Naval curl to denote certification , which urban legend said was granted in regard of the huge tonnages lost in the war
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 ) 

Similar Threads
-
By Raymond Bisseker in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 21
Last Post: 4th December 2014, 04:59 AM
-
By Captain Kong in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 5
Last Post: 1st October 2012, 09:20 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules